AI generates. ForgeRank AI evaluates.
You decide.

Paste a draft — get a scored read on three dimensions, the sentences that cost you points, and three sizes of fix, before it goes out.

No subscription · pay per result
Credits never expire
Paste→Score→3 answers→Fix at 3 sizes→Re-score→Decide
New analysis · Google / Blog ⚡ 1 free analysis/day
EXAMPLE RUN 2026-10-28 · 1,754 words · 59.0 s · record
86S
Content quality86S
Trustn/anot applicable
Can I publish this?Ready
Will AI search cite it?2 of 6
Will it read as AI-written?Clean
14 named checks · 2 sentences quoted · 3 sizes of fix See the sentences ↓
Three ways to fix — same draft, three sizes
ARTICLEDecision and execution support
No cost statement anywhere: the reader is never told what the platforms, tools, or paid social ads in step 9 cost in money or time.
  1. The tool-selection step should state what the tools cost in money or time, or say plainly that pricing varies and where to check it.
  2. Step 9's paid social ads should carry a cost line, since the piece recommends spending without saying what it takes.
  3. If no cost figure can be sourced, say so once up front so the reader knows the plan is priced elsewhere.
No paste-ready text at this level — it changes what the piece covers, not one sentence.
PARAGRAPHCheckable detail vs similar pieces
The recommendation steps other than goal-setting carry no quantity or executable specification, so a reader cannot check whether their audience research, posting cadence, or engagement effort matches anything concrete.
REWRITTEN PASSAGE＋ addedA content strategy will include elements such as content types and assets, a publishing schedule, and a calendar to manage when posts go live. Set the schedule as a cadence you can hold: for example, three posts a week per channel, planned one month ahead on the calendar. Noteworthy holidays to avoid posting or to have themed posts, and resocializing opportunities such as reposts of UGC, belong on that same calendar.
ops: add, distribute · 3 sentence(s) kept verbatim
SENTENCEResults and limits
The reported outcomes carry no basis — no who, what period, or what population the 10% month-over-month or 15%/20% figures come from.
REPLACEMENT＋ addedFor example, a business new to social media marketing may have a goal to increase total website traffic by 10% month-over-month, a figure drawn from [you add: source and period the 10% benchmark comes from].
Slot waits for your figure: The source and period behind the 10% month-over-month benchmark (who set it, over what period, for what kind of business).
Score, answers and fixes come from that one 2026-10-28 run. The AI-tone read was re-checked on the same text — a rule pass, not a model call.
1 free analysis per day · no signup · no card · your draft isn't stored
What “quality” actually means

One score. Three visible reasons.

ForgeRank AI doesn't reduce content quality to one vague “AI score”. Every piece is read on three named dimensions, and you can see the reasons behind the number.

Purpose fulfillment Did it deliver what it promised?

Answers the question its title sets up, stays inside the scope its format promises, and leaves a reader able to act without a follow-up question.

Reader experience Can the reader understand and use it?

Relevance, specifics, the conditions that make the advice work, terms defined where they appear, and sentences that say one thing plainly.

Claim support Are the claims backed by reasoning or evidence?

Facts a reader might doubt point to where they came from, claims carry the reason they hold, and the piece shows where its results stop holding.

Kept separate from the score: AI-tone phrasing · evidence needs · publishing readiness — three parallel reads that never fold into the number. A style flag can't drag a solid draft down, and a high score can't hide a claim without a source.
★ Real output — one brief, three platforms

Same gate, different channels

“3 things that make AI content feel fake” — one brief, rewritten for each platform, then scored by the same gate. Each card links to its recorded run.

𝕏
X · single post

The 3 tells of fake AI writing

“AI content reeks when it's 1) allergic to periods, 2) allergic to opinions, and 3) allergic to being wrong. Real humans have edges. Mine is the missing bad take.”

short-form rubric · recorded run →
📸
Instagram · feed post

Spot AI content in three seconds

“You can spot AI content in about three seconds, and grammar isn't the real giveaway. The tells are all in what's missing.”

short-form rubric · recorded run →
🎵
TikTok · video script

The tell: it's never wrong about anything

“Nobody talks like a grammar checker. Real people say 'gonna,' trail off mid-thought, double back to fix what they meant.”

video-script rubric · recorded run →

Written by ForgeRank AI, then scored by the same gate you just tried above. Run dates and files are listed on /receipts · see a full scored report →

● The receipts · real QC records, dated

Built on real runs, not marketing numbers

Every score we publish comes from a recorded run in this repo, filed with its date and file. Nothing here is a made-up figure — and we publish the low scores too.

45
QC-scored pages live on this site — 10 editorial articles + 35 trend guides, listed with their scores on /receipts
15
articles in the first documented QC batch (reports 2026-08-28) — 2 fabricated numbers caught & fixed before publish
8
platform-native formats & rubrics (Google → Reddit)
Every score is a dated, recorded run: three samples, median kept, filed with its date — and re-scoring is one click. Where a repeat run lands a tier apart, we say so instead of rounding it away.
— Product rule, not a marketing claim: /receipts lists the runs, the dates and the measured run-to-run spread
● Real runs only

Browse recorded runs and QC records: real scored report → · 35 QC'd topic articles →

Built in public — this whole SaaS (quality gate included) was made in 12 days. Read the free chapters →

🎁
Not sure yet? Try 10 articles on us.
No credit card. No contract. No subscription. Get the full Deep Insight Report on every piece — same as a paid plan.

Simple, per-article pricing

🎁 FIRST PURCHASE
🚀 Starter
$0.0666per article
50 credits · $4.99 one-time
→ 75 credits on first purchase
Best for solo creators getting started with one channel — if you ship about one piece a week (~4 a month), that comes to ≈ $0.27 a month at the first-purchase rate. (+25 bonus on your first order)
★ Most popular · 🏆 Pro
$0.09per article
200 credits · $17.99 one-time
Best for regular creators building a few platforms — if you ship about two pieces a week (~9 a month), that comes to ≈ $0.81 a month — paid once, no monthly fee.
👑 Business
$0.08per article
500 credits · $39.99 one-time
Best for teams and agencies publishing across all 8 platforms — if you ship about five pieces a week (~22 a month), that comes to ≈ $1.76 a month — paid once, no monthly fee.
Secure checkout via Waffo Pancake · also pay with crypto
VISA Mastercard Amex Apple Pay Google Pay ₿ Crypto

Your card details are never stored by us. Taxes are included where applicable. Credits never expire. Read our Refund Policy & Terms.

Questions people ask

Is ForgeRank AI a writer, a content checker, or both?
Both — but the quality gate comes first.
ForgeRank AI can generate platform-native drafts for 8 channels, but its core job is different from a general-purpose AI writer: it evaluates content quality on a three-dimension rubric against its own pass line, diagnoses why a draft falls short, names the single highest-priority fix with the sentence it points at, runs the separate AI-tone and evidence checks, and lets you re-score before publishing. ChatGPT generates. ForgeRank evaluates. “Publish-ready” means structured for documented platform signals — never a promise of a ranking position.
What is the Analyzer / scoring mode?
The workbench has two modes: Create (generate) and Analyze (score any article you paste — a competitor's post, a viral piece, or your own draft). Analyze returns a Content Quality Score (the three named dimensions for long-form, the short-form rubric for posts, script quality for video scripts), instant free AI-tone phrasing flags, publishing-readiness checks for the platforms you plan to post to, and an expert review with the most actionable fix. "Generate similar" turns a winning piece into a new draft.
Why is pay-per-article cheaper?
Subscriptions charge you whether you publish or not. With credits you only pay for what you ship, the first 10 articles are free, no card required, and a generation that misses the score threshold you set regenerates free — we only keep credits for output you actually used.
Who owns the content I generate?
You do — full stop. The output is yours to publish, edit, repost, or sell. No royalties, no attribution, no licensing traps.
Will Google penalize AI-generated content?
Google ranks helpful, people-first content regardless of how it's produced. Our job is the quality side: sourced claims, real specificity, no invented data — plus a scored report so you can see what a draft is doing before you publish. We don't claim to predict rankings. Read our Acceptable Use policy for what's off-limits.
How is this different from Jasper or Surfer SEO?
ForgeRank AI is built around the quality gate, not just generation or optimization. Jasper focuses on generating content, and Surfer focuses on search optimization — neither one tells you whether the draft is worth publishing. ForgeRank AI scores the draft on three dimensions, explains why it scored that way, names the highest-priority fix with the sentence it points at, runs the separate AI-tone and evidence checks, and lets you re-score before you publish. Generation and platform formatting are built into the same workflow. See the full feature breakdown.
Do you invent data or statistics?
No. Honest AI is a product rule, not a slogan: data claims require sources, AI estimates are flagged as estimates, and publish-kit quotes point back to their source in the article. If a number can't be sourced, we say so instead of making it up.
🛡️ What we don't do: no fake "probability" percentages · no "100% human" / bypass / detector claims · no invented testimonials, cases or data · no ranking guarantees · no "unlimited" anything. Every score here links to a recorded run · our principles · how the gate works
10 free articles · no card · Deep Insight Report included
Featured on Whatsthebigdata